EJF Newsletter —2018 Review of Colorado Judges

Additional copies of this report in printable PDF format (10 pages) are available on the web.

Basic to the rule of law is the selection of competent, well-educated, and wise judges. Conversely, there must be an effective way of removing those who don't make the cut.

Colorado has separate judicial nominating and judicial performance commissions. However, they are both staffed with political picks so there are some holes in the process.

To help weed out bad judges all Colorado state judges must stand for retention by the voters at fixed intervals in even years. Reports on each judge are prepared by judicial performance commissions in each of the 22 judicial districts. But, being political, these commissions usually whitewash the judges.

In 2018 there are 128 judges standing for retention in Colorado but only two were determined to not meet performance standards by the commissions and; thus, should be voted out.

The Equal Justice Foundation has long been independently tracking judicial performance and thinks the number of bad judges is considerably more than two. Inasmuch as the judicial performance commissions seek input from the attorneys who know the judges, in 2012 we began compiling our own tabulation of good and bad judges based solely on the attorney votes reported to the separate commissions, in essence a jury of the judge's peers. That provides a simple to understand and brief statement of the judge's performance, and what the attorneys who know the judge best think of them.

The EJF 2018 judicial performance review based on attorney votes is below. By our measure 23 of the 128 judges standing for retention this year should not be retained and voted off the bench. The performance of 43 more is found to be marginal at best.

If you live in another state perhaps our method may be of some use in establishing a similar method of evaluating judges. Additional copies of our 2018 report can be found online and reviews and much of the history of all Colorado judges can be found here.

Issues The Equal Justice Foundation Deals With

| Courts, Veteran Courts, & Civil Liberties | Prohibition & War On Drugs | Vote Fraud & Election Issues |

2018 Colorado Judicial Performance Evaluations

October 16, 2018

Top

EJF Evaluations Based On Attorney Judgments

Criteria

• Retain >85% of attorneys voted to retain;

• Marginal 71-85% of attorneys voted to retain;

• Do Not Retain <=70% of attorneys voted to retain. Note that this level was lowered from 75% to 70% in 2018 suggesting judicial standards are not improving.

Retention intervals

All judges first stand for retention two years after their appointment or a promotion to a higher bench. After that they stand for retention based on the court they sit in at the following intervals so long as they remain on that bench:

• Supreme Court justices — every 10 years;

• Court of Appeals judges — every 8 years;

• District court judges — every 6 years;

• County court judges — every 4 years.

Magistrates are not state judges and serve at the pleasure of the chief judge of the respective judicial district, not the citizens. Municipal judges are in a similar category in their local municipalities.

Copies of this report in PDF format are available here.

2018 Judicial Performance Commission Evaluation						2018 EJF Evaluation Based on Attorney Votes
Judge	Finding	Attorney Votes		Prior Rating
Judge	Finding	Retain	Do Not Retain	Attorney % Retain
Colorado Supreme Court
Richard L. Gabriel	Meets Standards	98%	2%	Not on bench		Retain
Colorado Court of Appeals
CoA Judges				Prior 2010		2018
John Daniel Dailey	Meets Standards	79%	3%	84%	No Opinion	Marginal
Rebecca Rankin Freyre	Meets Standards	82%	9%	Not on bench		Marginal
Elizabeth L. Harris	Meets Standards	65%	12%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
David J. Richman	Meets Standards	88%	12%	65%	No Opinion	Retain
First Judicial District Judges (Gilpin, Jefferson)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Christie A. Bachmeyer	Meets Standards	79%	15%	90%	Retain	Marginal
Diego G. Hunt	Meets Standards	89%	4%	Not on bench		Retain
Laura A. Tighe	Meets Standards	53%	44%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Gilpin County				Prior 2014		2018
David C. Taylor	Meets Standards	Insufficient data		Not on bench		No Opinion
Jefferson County				Prior 2014		2018
Susan Lori Fisch	Meets Standards	95%	0%	85%	Marginal	Retain
Mark Marrow Randall	Meets Standards	87%	N/A	70%	Do Not Retain	Retain
Ryan James Stuart	Meets Standards	91%	6%	79%	Marginal	Retain
Thomas Vance	Meets Standards	90%	3%	89%	Retain	Retain
Jean Woodford	Meets Standards	79%	N/A	71%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Second Judicial District Judges (Denver County)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Shelley I. Gilman	Meets Standards	90%	5%	93%	Retain	Retain
David H. Goldberg	Meets Standards	94%	6%	Not on bench		Retain
Jay Sutherland Grant	Meets Standards	95%	5%	Not on bench		Retain
Morris B. Hoffman	Meets Standards	87%	10%	92%	Retain	Retain
Kenneth Martin Laff	Meets Standards	87%	13%	81%	Marginal	Retain
Catherine A. Lemon	Meets Standards	67%	24%	88%	Retain	Do Not Retain
Jennifer B. Torrington	Meets Standards	70%	20%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Denver County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Johnny C. Barajas	Meets Standards	88%	12%	80%	Marginal	Questionable ethics
Brian Thomas Campbell	Meets Standards	97%	0%	81%	Marginal	Retain
Andrea Eddy	Meets Standards	92%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
Adam J. Espinosa	Meets Standards	82%	9%	Not on bench		Marginal
Olympia Z. Fay	Meets Standards	90%	4%	Not on bench		Retain
Clarisse M. Gonzales	Meets Standards	82%	18%	93%	Retain	Marginal
Kerri Lombardi	Meets Standards	79%	18%	Not on bench		Marginal
Chelsea Malone	Meets Standards	Insufficient data		Not on bench		No Opinion
Third Judicial District Judges (Huerfano, Las Animas)
No District or County Court Judges standing for retention.
Fourth Judicial District Judges (El Paso, Teller)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Eric Bentley	Meets Standards	86%	11%	Not on bench		Retain
Linda M. Billings-Vela	Meets Standards	94%	N/A	89%	Retain	Retain
Jill M. Brady	Meets Standards	84%	N/A	Not on bench		Marginal
Robert L. Lowrey	Meets Standards	100%	0%	96%	Retain	Retain
Timothy Schutz	Meets Standards	79%	13%	85%	Marginal	Marginal
Larry Edward Schwartz	Meets Standards	92%	8%	95%	Retain	Retain
Scott A. Sells	Meets Standards	81%	10%	94%	Retain	Marginal
David L. Shakes	Meets Standards	79%	10%	89%	Retain	Marginal
El Paso County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Christopher Ed Acker	Does NOT Meets Standards	62%	N/A	64%	Do Not Retain	Do Not Retain
Lawrence D. Martin	Meets Standards	90%	10%	87%	Retain	Retain
Douglas J. Miles	Meets Standards	86%	N/A	83%	Marginal	Retain
Ann M. Rotolo	Meets Standards	73%	14%	70%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Teller County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Theresa L. Kilgore	Meets Standards	64%	36%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Fifth Judicial District Judges (Clear Creek, Eagle, Lake, Summit)
No District Court or County Court Judges standing for retention.
Sixth Judicial District Judges (Archuleta, La Plata, San Juan)
No District Court Judges standing for retention.
Archuleta County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Justin P. Fay	Meets Standards	86%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
No county court judges are standing for retention in La Plata or San Juan Counties
Seventh Judicial District Judges (Delta, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Montrose, Ouray, San Miguel)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Steven L. Schultz	Meets Standards	95%	5%	Not on bench		Retain
Keri A. Yoder	Meets Standards	87%	9%	Not on bench		Retain
Montrose County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Ben A Morris	Meets Standards	77%	23%	62%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
San Miguel County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Susanne J. Ross	Meets Standards	33%	17%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
No county court judges standing for retention in Delta, Gunnison, Hinsdale, or Ouray counties
Eighth Judicial District Judges (Jackson, Larimer)
No District Court Judges standing for retention.
Jackson County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Cindy Wilson	Meets Standards	100%	0%	80%	Marginal	Retain
Larimer County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Thomas L. Lynch	Meets Standards	92%	8%	92%	Retain	Retain
Peter E. Schoon Jr.	Meets Standards	71%	21%	79%	Marginal	Do Not Retain
Ninth Judicial District Judges (Garfield, Pitkin, Rio Blanco)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
James Berkley Boyd	Meets Standards	84%	9%	94%	Retain	Marginal
Anne K. Norrdin	Meets Standards	83%	6%	Not on bench		Marginal
Christopher G. Seldin	Meets Standards	100%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
Garfield County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Paul H. Metzger	Meets Standards	100%	0%	96%	Retain	Retain
Jonathan B. Pototsky	Meets Standards	100%	0%	94%	Retain	Retain
Pitkin County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Erin Fernandez-Ely	Meets Standards	100%	0%	91%	Retain	Retain
Rio Blanco County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Laurie A. Noble	Meets Standards	100%	0%	88%	Retain	Retain
Tenth Judicial District Judges (Pueblo)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Deborah Eyler	Meets Standards	84%	16%	90%	Retain	Marginal
Kim Karn	Meets Standards	93%	7%	Not on bench		Retain
Pueblo County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Steven B. Fieldman	Meets Standards	97%	3%	84%	Marginal	Retain
David Lee Lobato	Meets Standards	87%	7%	94%	Retain	Retain
Eleventh Judicial District Judges (Chaffee, Custer, Fremont, Park)
District Court judges				Prior 2012		2018
Ramsey Lama	Meets Standards	84%	11%	Not on bench		Marginal
Lynette M. Wenner	Meets Standards	71%	21%	Not on bench		Sub-Marginal
Custer County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Amanda Jean Hunter	Meets Standards	67%	33%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Park County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Brian L. Green	Meets Standards	70%	20%	84%	Marginal	Do Not Retain
No county court judges standing for retention in Chaffee or Fremont counties
Twelfth Judicial District Judges (Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, Mineral, Rio Grande, Saguache)
District Judge				Prior 2012		2018
Pattie P. Swift	Meets Standard	100%	0%	83%	Marginal	Retain
Alamosa County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Daniel A. Walzl	Meets Standards	80%	13%	69%	Do Not Retain	Marginal ?
Costilla County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Kimberly L. Wood	Meets Standards	71%	18%	52%	Do Not Retain	Sub-Marginal
Rio Grande County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Barbara A. Zollars	Meets Standards	88%	6%	Not on bench		Retain
Saguache County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Anna Ulrich	Meets Standards	67%	33%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Thirteenth Judicial District Judges (Kit Carson, Logan, Morgan, Phillips, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Charles M. Hobbs	Meets Standards	83%	8%	95%	Retain	Marginal
Carl S. McGuire, III	Meets Standards	94%	0%	96%	Retain	Retain
Michael K. Singer	Meets Standards	91%	9%	86%	Retain	Retain
Kit Carson County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Michael K. Grinnan	Meets Standards	94%	6%	94%	Retain	Retain
Washington County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Kelly S. Hansen	Meets Standards	Only two votes		Not on bench		Insufficient data
No county court judges standing for retention in Logan, Morgan, Phillips, Sedgwick, or Yuma counties
Fourteenth Judicial District Judges (Grand, Moffat, Routt)
District Judge				Prior 2012		2018
Michael A. O'Hara III	Meets Standards	67%	19%	85%	Marginal	Do Not Retain
Grand County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Nicholas Catanzarite	Meets Standards	70%	30%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Moffat County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Sandra H. Gardner	Meets Standards	79%	11%	93%	Retain	Marginal
Routt County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
James H. Garrecht	Meets Standards	85%	5%	92%	Retain	Marginal
Fifteenth Judicial District Judges (Baca, Cheyenne, Kiowa, Prowers)
District Judge				Prior 2012		2018
Michael Davidson	Meets Standards	86%	N/A	Not on bench		Retain
Baca County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Debra M. Gunkel	Meets Standards	33%	33%	91%	Retain	Do Not Retain
Cheyenne County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Gerald Keefe	Meets Standards	100%	0%	100%	Retain	Retain
Kiowa County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Gary W. Davis	Meets Standards	50%	50%	67%	Do Not Retain	Do Not Retain
Prowers County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Curtis Lane Porter	Meets Standards	100%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
Sixteenth Judicial District Judges (Bent, Crowley, Otero)
No District Court Judges standing for retention in 2018.
Otero County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Douglas R. Manley	Meets Standards	86%	9%	82%	Marginal	Retain
No county judges seeking retention in Bent and Crowley Counties
Seventeenth Judicial District Judges (Adams, Broomfield)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Jaclyn Brown	Meets Standards	97%	3%	Not on bench		Retain
Sharon D. Holbrook	Meets Standards	100%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
Edward C. Moss	Meets Standards	76%	21%	83%	Marginal	Marginal
Donald S. Quick	Meets Standards	76%	16%	Not on bench		Marginal
Adams County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Brian N. Bowen	Meets Standards	73%	16%	65%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Michael A. Cox	Meets Standards	80%	20%	93%	Retain	Marginal
Cindy Dang	Meets Standards	19%	65%	Not on bench		Do Not retain
Brian L. Howell	Meets Standards	66%	26%	58%	Do Not Retain	Do Not Retain
Sabino E. Romano	Meets Standards	96%	4%	97%	Retain	Retain
Dianna L. Roybal	Meets Standards	74%	11%	44%	Do Not Retain	Sub-Marginal
Broomfield County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Amy E. Bockman	Meets Standards	73%	18%	65%	Do Not Retain	Sub-Marginal
Eighteenth Judicial District Judges (Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert, Lincoln)
District Court Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Phillip L. Douglass	Does NOT Meet Standards	44%	44%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Patricia Herron	Meets Standards	85%	8%	Not on bench		Marginal
Gary M. Kramer	Meets Standards	85%	13%	Not on bench		Marginal
Ben L. Leutwyler III	Meets Standards	92%	0%	Not on bench		Retain
Robert R. Lung	Meets Standards	88%	6%	N/A	Promoted 2016	Retain
Bonnie H. McLean	Meets Standards	85%	8%	Not on bench		Marginal
Peter F. Michaelson	Meets Standards	83%	10%	89%	Retain	Marginal
Michael Spear	Meets Standards	80%	13%	67%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Shay K. Whitaker	Meets Standards	85%	4%	Not on bench		Marginal
Arapahoe County Judges (18th Judicial District)				Prior 2014		2018
Colleen Clark	Meets Standards	63%	38%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Kelly A. LaFave	Meets Standards	53%	40%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Michael J. Roche	Meets Standards	67%	24%	Not on bench		Do Not Retain
Cheryl Rowles-Stokes	Meets Standards	45%	45%	33%	Do Not Retain	Do Not Retain
Douglas County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
Lawrence Bowling	Meets Standards	96%	4%	89%	Retain	Retain
Monica J. Gomez	Meets Standards	86%	9%	71%	Do Not Retain	Retain
Susanna Meissner-Cutler	Meets Standards	89%	6%	90%	Retain	Retain
Elbert County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Palmer L. Boyette	Meets Standards	93%	0%	86%	Retain	Retain
Lincoln County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Truston Lee Fisher	Meets Standards	Not given		23%	Do Not Retain	Insufficient data
Nineteenth Judicial District Judges (Weld)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
James F. Hartmann	Meets Standards	95%	2%	96%	Retain	Retain
Todd L. Taylor	Meets Standards	87%	13%	93%	Retain	Retain
Weld County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
John J. Briggs	Meets Standards	88%	13%	77%	Marginal	Retain
Michele L. Meyer	Meets Standards	92%	8%	76%	Marginal	Retain
Dana Nichols	Meets Standards	82%	18%	62%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Charles S. Unfug	Meets Standards	78%	22%	72%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Twentieth Judicial District Judges (Boulder)
District Judges				Prior 2012		2018
Thomas Francis Mulvahill	Meets Standards	77%	N/A	91%	Retain	Marginal
Norma A. Sierra	Meets Standards	76%	N/A	70%	Do Not Retain	Marginal
Boulder County Judges				Prior 2014		2018
David Archuleta	Meets Standards	80%	N/A	89%	Retain	Marginal
Elizabeth Brodsky	Meets Standards	89%	N/A	Not on bench		Retain
Twenty-First Judicial District Judges (Mesa)
District Court Judge				Prior 2012		2018
Lance P. Tembreza	Meets Standards	94%	N/A	Not on bench		Retain
Mesa County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
Bruce R. Raaum	Meets Standards	73%	N/A	71%	Do Not Retain	Sub-Marginal
Twenty-Second Judicial District Judges (Dolores, Montezuma)
District Court Judge				Prior 2012		2018
Todd J. Plewe	Meets Standards	88%	N/A	92%	Retain	Retain
Montezuma County Judge				Prior 2014		2018
JenniLynn Lawrence	Meets Standards	71%	N/A	76%	Marginal	Sub-Marginal
No county court judges standing for retention in Dolores County

Notes

Top

The table above is intended as brief reference to help voters decide how to vote on state judges in their judicial district who are standing for retention in November 2018.

Additional copies of this report in printable PDF format (10 pages) are available on the web.

Our objective with these reports is to support the many outstanding judges who serve Colorado citizens while helping voters decide to eliminate those who are unfit for the position they hold. The basic assumption we've made is that the prosecutors, defense, and civil litigation attorneys know the judges in their judicial district best. They are the ones who deal with the judges on a daily basis and have the education and experience to judge the judges. As a result, the Equal Justice Foundation evaluation is based entirely on how these attorneys voted on a particular judge; a simple and easily understood metric that is reasonably consistent across the state. In essence, attorneys are a jury of the judge's peers.

The official judicial performance commission evaluations for state judges dates back to 1990 and they have been posting percentages of attorney votes for and against a judge since 2000. The commissions collect more data than just attorney votes but seldom rule against judges. In 2018, of 128 judges standing for retention, the political appointees of the various commissions only ruled that two of the state's judges did not meet acceptable performance standards. Note that magistrates serve at the pleasure of the chief judge of the judicial district and are not considered state judges and; thus, are not evaluated here.

However, as a general rule, in any large organization it is reasonable to expect that roughly 10% of the individuals in the organization will be incompetent, drunkards, mentally or physically unfit, crooks, or otherwise unsuitable. Of course, sex always rears its lovely head, but copulating with the prosecutor in the judge's chambers, or trying to make a date from the bench with the cutie standing before the bar does exceed the limits of propriety. On the EJF web site in the Colorado Judges — Citizen's Review chapter we have documented all of those behaviors, and more, by one or more judges. Further, politics, religion, and ideology have no place in a fair and impartial courtroom and a judge's ruling must not be based on emotions and feelings.

If you would like to go sit in a judge's courtroom and form your own opinion we have courtwatcher forms available that should be of some assistance to you in that endeavor. We link appropriately completed courtwatcher forms to the judge's name on our web site.

The Equal Justice Foundation has been producing these biennial evaluations of Colorado judges since 2012. Thus, it is possible to compare the performance of judges standing for retention in 2018 with their prior evaluations, as has been done in the above table. Of the 42 district judges who stood for retention in 2012, only 21 are standing for retention again. Of the 76 county court judges who stood for retention in 2014, only 53 are standing for retention again in 2018. The others have retired, stepped down, or been removed from the bench for other reasons, as we have attempted to document. Thus, 21 district judge and 23 county judge positions have opened up in the past four to six years. But that count is incomplete and we find 46 judges now standing for retention who were promoted to a state court bench in the past two or three years and are now standing for retention for the first time; a small and not surprising difference.

Of more concern is the large number of judges we do not think should be retained based on attorney appraisals and past history. If we had used the same standards as in 2014, over 40 of the 128 judges would have been found unfit. Even lowering our Do Not Retain standard by 5%, we still suggest that 23 judges who are standing for retention should be voted off the bench. Of the 128 total we also suggest that the performance of an additional 41 judges is marginal at best. We express particular concern for those judges whose past performance was marginal at their previous review and attorneys now rate their performance as worsening, as documented in the table above.

However, the final decision is in the hands of the voters and we hope this document is a useful tool for helping them decide which jurists they want to keep on the bench.

Support

Top

We would be amiss if we did not conclude with a plea for support for our work. The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) public charity and contributions are tax deductible. It should be obvious that there are many costs to doing research like this on a continuing basis. However, the Foundation has no paid employees so all of your support goes into helping with the research and dissemination of same. We note with pride that during 2017 the research and stories on our web sites was accessed by an average of 2,400 unique visitors a day by people in every state and at least 180 other countries. Our work is also commonly reposted on other sites all around the world as well.

It would be greatly appreciated if you would donate whatever you can online or by sending a check to the address below. If interested in helping with our work, or joining the Foundation, that can be done online as well, or by printing and filling out the form available here and mailing it to the address on the form together with a check or money order for your dues. Dues are just ($25/year, which are not onerous, and there is strength in numbers.

Top

Issues The Equal Justice Foundation Deals With

| Courts, Veteran Courts, & Civil Liberties | Prohibition & War On Drugs | Vote Fraud & Election Issues |

EJF Newsletter —2018 Review of Colorado Judges

Additional copies of this report in printable PDF format (10 pages) are available on the web.

Issues The Equal Justice Foundation Deals With

2018 Colorado Judicial Performance Evaluations

EJF Evaluations Based On Attorney Judgments

Criteria

Retention intervals

Copies of this report in PDF format are available here.

2018 Judicial Performance Commission Evaluation

2018 EJF Evaluation

Colorado Supreme Court

Colorado Court of Appeals

First Judicial District Judges (Gilpin, Jefferson)

Second Judicial District Judges (Denver County)

Third Judicial District Judges (Huerfano, Las Animas)

Fourth Judicial District Judges (El Paso, Teller)

Fifth Judicial District Judges (Clear Creek, Eagle, Lake, Summit)

Sixth Judicial District Judges (Archuleta, La Plata, San Juan)

Seventh Judicial District Judges (Delta, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Montrose, Ouray, San Miguel)

Eighth Judicial District Judges (Jackson, Larimer)

Ninth Judicial District Judges (Garfield, Pitkin, Rio Blanco)

Tenth Judicial District Judges (Pueblo)

Eleventh Judicial District Judges (Chaffee, Custer, Fremont, Park)

Twelfth Judicial District Judges (Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, Mineral, Rio Grande, Saguache)

Thirteenth Judicial District Judges (Kit Carson, Logan, Morgan, Phillips, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma)

Fourteenth Judicial District Judges (Grand, Moffat, Routt)

Fifteenth Judicial District Judges (Baca, Cheyenne, Kiowa, Prowers)

Sixteenth Judicial District Judges (Bent, Crowley, Otero)

Seventeenth Judicial District Judges (Adams, Broomfield)

Eighteenth Judicial District Judges (Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert, Lincoln)

Nineteenth Judicial District Judges (Weld)

Twentieth Judicial District Judges (Boulder)

Twenty-First Judicial District Judges (Mesa)

Twenty-Second Judicial District Judges (Dolores, Montezuma)

Notes

The table above is intended as brief reference to help voters decide how to vote on state judges in their judicial district who are standing for retention in November 2018.

Additional copies of this report in printable PDF format (10 pages) are available on the web.

Support

Issues The Equal Justice Foundation Deals With